<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Barack Obama for President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twomadgeeks.com/change/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change</link>
	<description>Barack your socks off</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Poll: Obama beats McCain as barbecue guest by Greg</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/07/poll-obama-beats-mccain-as-barbecue-guest/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=410#comment-185</guid>
		<description>The answer for me is simple.

Whoever wins these "who would you rather have a beer, barbecue with, etc" , usually wins the the White House.  

IIRC, Bush won this poll over Kerry, Bush won this poll over Gore, Clinton won this poll over Dole, and down the line..

the meaning for me is..whoever us American peeps seem to 'like' the most wins.  I would have posted this here if McCain would have won the poll.

and I'd take Angelina any day also (-:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer for me is simple.</p>
<p>Whoever wins these &#8220;who would you rather have a beer, barbecue with, etc&#8221; , usually wins the the White House.  </p>
<p>IIRC, Bush won this poll over Kerry, Bush won this poll over Gore, Clinton won this poll over Dole, and down the line..</p>
<p>the meaning for me is..whoever us American peeps seem to &#8216;like&#8217; the most wins.  I would have posted this here if McCain would have won the poll.</p>
<p>and I&#8217;d take Angelina any day also (-:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poll: Obama beats McCain as barbecue guest by bruce collipp</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/07/poll-obama-beats-mccain-as-barbecue-guest/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce collipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 04:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=410#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I know you support Obama as does most of the media. What does having someone to a barbeque have to being president. Personally I would rather haveAngelina Jolie than either of these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you support Obama as does most of the media. What does having someone to a barbeque have to being president. Personally I would rather haveAngelina Jolie than either of these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romney tops McCain veep list by Ted</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/06/romney-tops-mccain-veep-list/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=402#comment-176</guid>
		<description>All the media buzz which will surround Palin -- essentially free to McCain -- will be worth millions and millions of dollars of PR (more money than Romney could provide anyway).

It appears that it’s all down to Palin or Romney, and team Romney fears Palin now has the best shot, so Romney camp is mounting a blogosphere-wide assault via Politico.

The tip-off that Politico is just a “promote Romney” piece is that it mentions EVERY NAME in the next two tiers of Veep prospects EXCEPT SARAH PALIN!!! — even names far more unlikely than Palin (since Romney camp knows Palin is the ONLY ONE who tops — I’ll say tops by far — Romney as McCain’s best pick). 

Bottom line, Romney and Politico fear Palin most — as do the Dems and the MSM. (By the way, the Dems and MSM do not fear Romney the most — which says a lot.)

AOL, prime on-line pro-Obama/pro-Dem player, is now carrying the Politico piece promoting Romney buzz.

Clearly AOL wants McCain and the GOP to lose the general elction — hence they gladly promote Romney (no mention of Palin).

Also, CNN had Romney — kind of out of the blue — attacking Obama. Again, CNN, wanting McCain and the GOP to lose, gladly promotes Romney (to attempt to avert the Palin threat).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the media buzz which will surround Palin &#8212; essentially free to McCain &#8212; will be worth millions and millions of dollars of PR (more money than Romney could provide anyway).</p>
<p>It appears that it’s all down to Palin or Romney, and team Romney fears Palin now has the best shot, so Romney camp is mounting a blogosphere-wide assault via Politico.</p>
<p>The tip-off that Politico is just a “promote Romney” piece is that it mentions EVERY NAME in the next two tiers of Veep prospects EXCEPT SARAH PALIN!!! — even names far more unlikely than Palin (since Romney camp knows Palin is the ONLY ONE who tops — I’ll say tops by far — Romney as McCain’s best pick). </p>
<p>Bottom line, Romney and Politico fear Palin most — as do the Dems and the MSM. (By the way, the Dems and MSM do not fear Romney the most — which says a lot.)</p>
<p>AOL, prime on-line pro-Obama/pro-Dem player, is now carrying the Politico piece promoting Romney buzz.</p>
<p>Clearly AOL wants McCain and the GOP to lose the general elction — hence they gladly promote Romney (no mention of Palin).</p>
<p>Also, CNN had Romney — kind of out of the blue — attacking Obama. Again, CNN, wanting McCain and the GOP to lose, gladly promotes Romney (to attempt to avert the Palin threat).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Romney tops McCain veep list by Ted</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/06/romney-tops-mccain-veep-list/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=402#comment-172</guid>
		<description>The tip-off that Politico is just a “promote Romney” piece is that it mentions EVERY NAME in the next two tiers of Veep prospects EXCEPT SARAH PALIN!!! — even names far more unlikely than Palin (since Romney camp knows Palin is the ONLY ONE who tops — I’ll say tops by far — Romney as McCain’s best pick). 

Bottom line, Romney and Politico fear Palin most — as do the Dems and the MSM. (By the way, the Dems and MSM do not fear Romney the most — which says a lot.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tip-off that Politico is just a “promote Romney” piece is that it mentions EVERY NAME in the next two tiers of Veep prospects EXCEPT SARAH PALIN!!! — even names far more unlikely than Palin (since Romney camp knows Palin is the ONLY ONE who tops — I’ll say tops by far — Romney as McCain’s best pick). </p>
<p>Bottom line, Romney and Politico fear Palin most — as do the Dems and the MSM. (By the way, the Dems and MSM do not fear Romney the most — which says a lot.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colin Powell supports Obama&#8217;s views on Diplomacy(video) by Greg</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/06/colin-powell-supports-obamas-views-on-diplomacyvideo/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=345#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Colin Powell for Secretary of State!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin Powell for Secretary of State!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powell downplays Obama &#8216;inexperience&#8217; by SAM</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/04/powell-downplays-obama-inexperience/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>SAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=77#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Regarding the National Fingerprint Registry...... hasn't anyone read the last book of the Bible....Revelation.  Is this the start of things to come?  The beginning of "end of days"? God bless America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the National Fingerprint Registry&#8230;&#8230; hasn&#8217;t anyone read the last book of the Bible&#8230;.Revelation.  Is this the start of things to come?  The beginning of &#8220;end of days&#8221;? God bless America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powell downplays Obama &#8216;inexperience&#8217; by Carole</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/04/powell-downplays-obama-inexperience/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=77#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I can't find a way to contact you on the site.  Would you please send me an email so I can discuss something regarding your site.  (I'm not selling anything; I promise!)

Thanks!

Carole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t find a way to contact you on the site.  Would you please send me an email so I can discuss something regarding your site.  (I&#8217;m not selling anything; I promise!)</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Carole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama vice president picks: Who are the frontrunners? by Vigilante</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/05/obama-vice-president-picks-who-are-the-frontrunners/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Vigilante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=216#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Please vote in my &lt;a href="http://the-vigil.blogspot.com/2008/05/who-should-be-barack-obamas-vice.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Instant Recount Voting (IRV)&lt;/a&gt; ballot on the next Vice-President of the United States! (And leave your name in the comments!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please vote in my <a href="http://the-vigil.blogspot.com/2008/05/who-should-be-barack-obamas-vice.html" rel="nofollow">Instant Recount Voting (IRV)</a> ballot on the next Vice-President of the United States! (And leave your name in the comments!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Clinton Joins McCain on Gas-Tax Holiday; Obama Opposes by Mike Harmon</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/04/clinton-joins-mccain-on-gas-tax-holiday-obama-opposes/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=146#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I came across your blog on Technorati.  Nice site layout.  I will stop by and read more soon.

Mike Harmon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across your blog on Technorati.  Nice site layout.  I will stop by and read more soon.</p>
<p>Mike Harmon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama is flush with money to spend; Clinton in debt by Tim Ramsey</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/04/obama-is-flush-with-money-to-spend-clinton-in-debt/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ramsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=138#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along.  I thought I would leave my first comment.  I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading.  Nice blog.

Tim Ramsey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came accross your blog and have been reading along.  I thought I would leave my first comment.  I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading.  Nice blog.</p>
<p>Tim Ramsey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Powell downplays Obama &#8216;inexperience&#8217; by Greg</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/04/powell-downplays-obama-inexperience/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=77#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Mr Powell,..please endorse Obama..

And accept a position if asked!

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Powell,..please endorse Obama..</p>
<p>And accept a position if asked!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Urges Parental Responsibility by Greg</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/04/obama-urges-parental-responsibility/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=84#comment-5</guid>
		<description>When was the last time we heard a (presidential)politician say this?  I can't recall..someone please remind me.  Seriously, this needed to be said 30 years ago! (and needs to be repeated constantly)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When was the last time we heard a (presidential)politician say this?  I can&#8217;t recall..someone please remind me.  Seriously, this needed to be said 30 years ago! (and needs to be repeated constantly)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Clinton defends wife&#8217;s Bosnia remarks by Greg</title>
		<link>http://twomadgeeks.com/change/2008/04/bill-clinton-defends-wifes-bosnia-remarks/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twomadgeeks.com/change/?p=85#comment-4</guid>
		<description>(said in that Hillary shrillness)Oh, just stop it!  Bill,..willya?

We had already forgot about your wife lying, YET AGAIN..but you had to bring it up again!

please go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(said in that Hillary shrillness)Oh, just stop it!  Bill,..willya?</p>
<p>We had already forgot about your wife lying, YET AGAIN..but you had to bring it up again!</p>
<p>please go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
